Hydration of Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate: Review and Analysis of Reaction Description Models

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

A review and critical analysis of kinetic models describing the CaSO4 · 0.5H2O hydration process is presented. Special attention is paid to their application to describe experimental data obtained by the conductometric method. Based on the analysis, it was found that stochastic models taking into account the probabilistic aspects of hydration demonstrate the highest compliance degree to the experiment. This allows to draw a reasonable conclusion on the advantages of the stochastic approach in describing complex physico-chemical processes characterized by a significant uncertainty degree. The analysis of the existing kinetic models of calcium sulfate hemihydrate hydration revealed their limitations in relation to real conditions. Traditional deterministic models based on chemical kinetic equations are not able to adequately consider random fluctuations occurring at the microscopic and molecular structural levels. This paper shows that stochastic models have significant advantages in describing complex processes such as CaSO4 · 0.5H2O hydration.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

S. Araslankin

Exponenta LLC; Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ceo@sci-exp.ru

CEO

Ресей, 26A, Stanislavskaya St., Ruzayevka, Republic of Mordovia, 431448; 23, Gagarin Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603600

O. Nipruk

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

Email: nipruk@chem.unn.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Chemistry)

Ресей, 23, Gagarin Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603600

A. Buryanov

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Email: rga-service@mail.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering)

Ресей, 26, Yaroslavskoe Hwy, Moscow, 129337

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Polak A.F., Babkov V.V., Andreeva E.P. Tverdeniye mineral’nykh vyazhushchikh veshchestv [Hardening of mineral binders]. Ufa: Bashkir book publishing house. 1990. 216 p.
  2. Kuznetsova T.V., Kudryashov I.V., Timashev V.V. Fizicheskaya khimiya vyazhushchikh materialov. [Physical chemistry of binders]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 1989. 384 p.
  3. Semerikov I.S., Gerasimova E.S. Fizicheskaya khimiya stroitel’nykh materialov [Physical chemistry of building materials]. Ekaterinburg: Publishing house of the Ural. University, 2015. 204 p.
  4. Singh N., Middendorf B. Calcium sulphate hemihydrate hydration leading to gypsum crystallization. Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials. 2007. Vol. 53. Iss. 1, pp. 57–77. EDN: MTOIYH. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.002
  5. Hand R. the kinetics of hydration of calcium sulphate hemihydrate: a critical comparison of the models in the literature. Cement and Concrete Research. 1994. Vol. 24. Iss. 5, pp. 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90008-6
  6. Dunn J.S. The setting of calcium sulphate plasters. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. 1938. Vol. 57. No. 7, pp. 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5000570703
  7. Avrami M. Kinetics of phase change. I. General Theory. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1939. Vol. 7, pp. 1103–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1750380
  8. Avrami M. Kinetics of phase change. II. Transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1940. Vol. 8, pp. 212–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1750631
  9. Avrami M. Granulation, phase change, and microstructure kinetics of phase change. III. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1941. Vol. 9, pp. 177–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1750872
  10. Conley R.F. The hydration reaction of anhydrite. Doctor’s Thesis. Indiana University, 1958.
  11. Ridge M.J. Acceleration of the set of gypsum plaster. Australian Journal of Applied Science. 1959. Vol. 10, pp. 218–231.
  12. Schiller K. Mechanism of re-crystallisation in calcium sulphate hemihydrate plasters. Journal of Applied Chemistry. 1962. Vol. 12. Iss. 3, pp. 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5010120310
  13. Ridge M.J. Hydration of calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Nature. 1964. Vol. 204, pp. 70–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/204070a0
  14. Taplin J.H. Hydration kinetics of calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Nature. 1965. Vol. 205. No. 4974, pp. 864–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/205864a0
  15. Combe E.C., Smith D.C., Braden M. Kinetics of hydration of autoclaved calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Journal of Applied Chemistry. 1970. Vol. 20. No. 9, pp. 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5010200905
  16. Karmazsin E., Comel C., Murat M. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Thermal Analysis. Ontario, 1982. 148 p.
  17. Gurgul S.J., Seng G., Williams G.R. A kinetic and mechanistic study into the transformation of calcium sulfate hemihydrate to dihydrate. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation. 2019. 26 (Pt 3), pp. 774–784. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577519001929
  18. Gualtieri A.F. Synthesis of sodium zeolites from a natural halloysite. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2001. Vol. 28, pp. 719–728. EDN: ARWRTT. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002690100197
  19. Araslankin S.V., Nipruk O.V. Stochastic modeling of the hydration kinetics of β-CaSO4 · 0,5H2O. Inorganic Materials. 2024. Vol. 60. No. 13, pp. 1444–1450. EDN: GVHENF. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168525700244
  20. Beretka J., Touw J.W. Hydration kinetics of calcium sulphate hemihydrate: a comp arison of models. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2007. Vol. 44 (1), pp. 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.280440104

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Kinetic curve of hydration of CaSO4 · 0,5H2O

Жүктеу (61KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Time correlation diagram τcalc = f (τexp): a – 1 – τcalc = τexp; 2, 3, 4, 5 – time calculated from the equations of Avrami (2), Shiller (5), Ridge (6) and Gualtieri (10); b – 1 – τcalc = τexp; 2, 3 – time calculated from stochastic models (11) and (12)

Жүктеу (152KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Kinetic curves of hydration of β-CaSO4 · 0,5H2O at 293 K: a – 1 – according to experimental data; 2, 3, 4, 5 – obtained from the equations of Avrami (2), Schiller (5), Ridge (6) and Gualtieri (10); b – 1 – according to experimental data; 2, 3 – obtained from stochastic models (11) and (12)

Жүктеу (129KB)
Метадеректер

© ООО РИФ "СТРОЙМАТЕРИАЛЫ", 2025