Significance of Insuring Herbicides for Stabilization of Weed Control Effectiveness and Quality when Using Betanals-Generics for Sugar Beet

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In the field in 2014–2020, three-component herbicides of betanal generics were tested against juvenile dicotyledonous weeds in sugar beet crops to compare with the effectiveness of the use of the original herbicide Betanal Expert of (BEOF) at application rate of 1.0 l/ha. It is shown that the stability of dilute emulsions of generic betanals depended on the characteristics of the structure and dispersion of working solutions, the ability to crystallize active substances, and reactions to various environmental conditions. The BEOF herbicide in the application rate of 1.0 l/ha differed from generic betanals in the same application rate by a higher effect on weeds. The weeds that formed 2 real leaves showed phase resistance to generic betanals more noticeably. The effectiveness of BEOF on weeds in the cotyledon phase was 6–8% higher than that of generics, and 18% higher when treating weeds in the phase of 2 real leaves. It was found that in the temperature range of 19–22°C, the efficiency of generic betanals was closest to the efficiency of the original BEOF. To stabilize the generic betanals efficacy on weeds with the original BEOF 1.0 l/ha, their application rate was increased by 15–20%. A mixture of generic betanals with the insurance herbicides Mitron and Caribou, applied 3 times in the recommended application rates in accordance with the phase of development of sugar beet, provided high purity of sowing and crop yield at the level of the control group with manual weeding. Herbicides, in addition to broad-leaved dicotyledonous weeds, effectively suppressed young plants of aspens and field bindweed. The insurance herbicides Mitron and Caribou offset the disadvantages of generic betanals when used together in the fight against weeds in sugar beet crops.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. A. Dvoryankin

A. L. Mazlumov All-Russian Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar

Author for correspondence.
Email: dvoryankin149@gmail.com
Russian Federation, VNIISS86, Ramonsky district, Voronezh region 396030

References

  1. Гуреев И.И. Эффективность обработки сахарной свеклы гербицидами группы бетанала – оригинальными и дженериками // Сахар. 2016. № 9. С. 17–19.
  2. Чернышова Е., Трофимов А. Под защитой. Как избежать ошибок при выборе СЗР // Агротехника и технологии. 2019. № 3–4.
  3. Гаджиева Г.И. Эффективность гербицида кианит, кэ в посевах сахарной свеклы // Актуальные проблемы в защите растений. Мат-лы Международ. научн.-практ. конф., посвящ. 65-летию кафедры защиты растений (г. Горки, 23–25 июня 2010 г.). С. 76–79.
  4. Дворянкин Е.А. Отдельные физико-химические показатели гербицидов группы бетанала // Сахар. свекла. 2012. № 6. С. 35–37.
  5. Дворянкин Е.А. Оптимизация возделывания сахарной свеклы. Воронеж, 2019. 252 с.
  6. Дворянкин Е.А. Качество и эффективность рабочих растворов гербицидов группы бетанала // Сахар. свекла. 2013. № 8. С. 33–38.
  7. Дворянкин Е.А. Эффективность действия свекловичных гербицидов на сорную растительность в посеве сахарной свеклы в зависимости от величины рН используемой воды и ее загрязненности бытовыми моющими средствами // Агрохимия. 2022. № 8. С. 33–43.
  8. Дворянкин Е.А. Эффективность гербицидов в борьбе с сорняками и их фитотоксичность для сахарной свеклы в зависимости от возраста обрабатываемых растений и нормы расхода препаратов // Агрохимия. 2023. № 3. С. 70–81.
  9. Паденов К.П., Довбан В.К. Сорные растения, их вредоносность, методы учета и меры борьбы. Минск, 1979. 55 с.
  10. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. М.: Колос, 1979. 416 с.
  11. Международный кодекс поведения в области распределения и использования пестицидов. Рук-во по контролю за качеством пестицидов. 2-я редакция. World Heath Organization. 2012. 43 с.
  12. Дворянкин Е.А. Коррекция рН баковых растворов гербицидов группы бетаналов и эффективность их действия на сорняки в посеве сахарной свеклы // Сахар. 2021. № 7. С. 24–26.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. A knapsack sprayer of the SOIO 425 type (473P) equipped with a rod with 6 sprayers designed for 6 rows of sugar beet.

Download (425KB)
3. Fig. 2. The effect of air temperature on the average effectiveness of three–component generic drugs of the betanal group in comparison with BEOF: 1 - BEOF, 1.0 l/ha, 2 – generic betanals, 1.0 l/ha. The same is shown in Fig. 3, 5-7.

Download (63KB)
4. Fig. 3. Formation of solid crystals in three-component herbicides of the betanal group.

Download (56KB)
5. Fig. 4. The effectiveness of crystalline solutions of generic betanals on weeds, depending on the size of the crystals in the solution: 1 – the solution was applied immediately after preparation, 2 – the solution was applied 6-7 hours after preparation (crystals of 10-15 microns in size), 3 – the solution was applied 12-16 hours after preparation (crystals of 40-80 microns in size).

Download (43KB)
6. Fig. 5. The effectiveness of herbicides of the betanal group depending on the time of sprinkling of plants after application of preparations at a consumption rate of 1.0 l/ ha.

Download (73KB)
7. Fig. 6. The effect of the pH of water on the effectiveness of the herbicides of the betanal group.

Download (61KB)
8. Fig. 7. Dynamics of weed death at the age of cotyledons–2 true leaves under the action of herbicides of the betanal group.

Download (67KB)
9. Fig. 8. The average effectiveness of three–component generic betanals on weed vegetation, depending on the rate of consumption of drugs in comparison with the original BEOF: 1 - BEOF, 1.0 l/ha; generic betanals: 2 – 1.0, 3 – 1.1, 4 – 1.15, 5 – 1.20, 6 – 1.25, 7 – 1.30 l/ha.

Download (69KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 The Russian Academy of Sciences