Metrological Aspects of Studying the Granulometric Composition of Soil According to The Method of N.A. Kachinsky

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Based on a significant volume of soil samples of various genesis presented on the territory of the Komi Republic, a study of their granulometric composition (GC) was carried out in accordance with the Kachinsky method (MK). Calculated, procedural, random and systematic factors influencing the precision and correctness of measurement results performed in accordance with the MK prescription are considered. The influence of sample preparation (the degree of grinding of soil samples) and procedures for measuring the mass fraction of elementary soil particles (ESP) on the quality of the results of studying soil GS was assessed. The instability of measuring the mass fraction of fine sand (0.05–0.25 mm) and coarse dust (0.01–0.05 mm) fractions when using the MK recipe was shown. The dependence of the uncertainty of measurement results, caused by random factors, on the mass fraction of ECPs included in the granulometric fractions is noted – the lower the mass fraction of ECPs in the composition of the fractions, the higher the uncertainty of the measurement results. A modification of the Kaczynski method (MMK) has been developed to improve the quality of soil HS assessment results. It includes: (1) separation of fine sand particles using a sieve with a mesh diameter of 0.05 mm (instead of calculating this fraction by difference according to the MK recipe); (2) use of scales of the first class of accuracy to measure the mass fraction of dust and sludge particles; (3) control of the HS research process based on the summation of the measured values of the mass fraction of ESP of six fractions and acid-soluble compounds (losses from HCl treatment). The standard for operational control of the mass fraction of the amount of ECP after dividing them into fractions is (100 ± 5)%. A metrological study of the Kaczynski technique and its modifications was carried out. The proposed modification of Kaczynski’s technique made it possible to reduce the uncertainty in the measurement results of the mass fraction of ECP of small fractions (ωn < 10%) and shift the lower limit of measurements to 1%.

About the authors

E. V. Vanchikova

Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: shamrik@ib.komisc.ru
Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

E. M. Lapteva

Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shamrik@ib.komisc.ru
Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

N. A. Vasilyeva

Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shamrik@ib.komisc.ru
Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

B. M. Kondratenok

Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shamrik@ib.komisc.ru
Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

E. V. Shamrikova

Institute of Biology of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shamrik@ib.komisc.ru
Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

References

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Fractionation scheme according to the Kachinsky method: g is the number of the aliquot part of the soil suspension; ω1–ω6 is the mass fraction of individual granulometric fractions.

Download (188KB)
3. Fig. 2. Relative deviation (θn) of the mass fraction of ECP fractions 1–6 (ωn), obtained using a sieve with a cell diameter of 1 and 2 mm (θn = (ωn1–ωn2)), depending on ωn. The red line marks the control standard. From here on: the fraction number is given according to Fig. 1; P – soil according to Table 2.

Download (333KB)
4. Fig. 3. Mass fraction of the ECP fractions (ω) of physical sand (1) and physical clay (2), obtained using a sieve with a cell diameter of 2 and 1 mm (‘). The error bars indicate the permissible values ​​of the relative uncertainty UA (%) of the average measurement result.

Download (208KB)
5. Fig. 4. Relative uncertainty (UA rel) of the mass fraction of the ECP fractions 1–6 (ωn), obtained according to MC (a) and MMC (b). UA rel was calculated using the statistical method and the results of intralaboratory reproducibility control (large and small symbols, respectively). P8, P9 – explanations in the text.

Download (360KB)
6. Fig. 5. Distribution of measured values ​​of the mass fraction (ωn) of the ECP fractions 1–3, obtained during the study of soil samples P8 (a) and P9 (b). From here on, the serial number of the measurement reflects the sequence of the studies over time.

Download (447KB)
7. Fig. 6. Relative uncertainty (UВ rel) of the mass fraction of the ECP fractions (ωn): 1 and 1ʹ – fraction 1, mп = 25 g and mп = 1٠ g, respectively (a); 3–6 – fraction number, mп = 25 g, 3ʹ–5ʹ – fractions 3–5, mп = 10 g (b, c). Note: a, b – scales of the second accuracy class were used, c – of the first accuracy class. The red line is the measurement limit ωn = 1%, the blue line is the UВ rel values ​​assigned to ωn.

Download (651KB)
8. Fig. 7. The effect of the sum of the minuend and the subtrahend in formula (3) (Σ(ωn)) on the relative uncertainty (UВ rel) of the mass fraction of the ECP of any of the six fractions, due to the measuring instruments (mп = 25 g, first accuracy class scales): 1 – 0.3–0.5%, 2 – 0.5–1%, 3 – 1.0–2.0%, 4 – 2.0–5.0%, 5 – 5.0–10%, 6 – >10%. Red lines are the established values ​​of UВ rel.

Download (546KB)
9. Fig. 8. Distribution of the mass fraction of the ECP fractions 1–6 and their sum Σ(1–6) (ωn) P49 (a) and P50 (b). The unshaded symbols of fractions 3 and Σ(1–6) indicate ωn obtained after introducing the correction (explanations in the text).

Download (621KB)
10. Fig. 9. Results of monitoring the sum of mass fractions of the ECP of six fractions and acid-soluble compounds Σ(ωn+ωks), obtained during the analysis of P49–P70 according to the MMC prescription.

Download (743KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences