Studies on the unisexual reptiles by and since i. S. Darevsky

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Reproduction without males is common among various animal taxa, however, it is rarely encountered in vertebrates. The discovery of obligate parthenogenesis, which does not require the participation of males for reproduction, by Ilya Sergeevich Darevsky, has contributed significantly to the development of evolutionary biology. In the middle of the last century, I. S. Darevsky and his colleagues defined the main directions of research on this phenomenon, thanks to which unisexual species of rock and whiptail lizards, geckos and skinks became the focus of attention for biologists studying the fundamental questions of species evolution. The pioneers of parthenogenesis in vertebrates have made significant progress in these studies, however, methodological approaches that have emerged in recent years allow to answer the questions related to the origin and evolution of unisexual vertebrates. In this review, we present the achievements and results in each direction of research conducted by I. S. Darevsky and his colleagues. In addition, we outline new ideas and mention the latest discoveries in the field of research on unisexual reptile species made after I. S. Darevsky had passed. In the concluding part of the work, we outline a range of tasks that require solutions in the future.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

E. Galoyan

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences; Zoological Museum, Moscow State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: saxicola@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071; Moscow, 125009

I. Kropachev

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences; Tula Exotarium

Email: saxicola@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071; Tula, 300002

V. Petrosyan

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: saxicola@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

D. Dedukh

Laboratory on Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics CAS

Email: saxicola@mail.ru
捷克共和国, Liběchov, 27721

F. Osipov

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: saxicola@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

M. Arakelyan

Research Institute of Biology, Yerevan State University

Email: saxicola@mail.ru
亚美尼亚, 1 Aleka Manukyan St., Yerevan, 0025

参考

  1. Астауров Б.Л., 1969. Экспериментальная полиплоидия и гипотеза непрямого (опосредованного партеногенезом) происхождения естественной полиплоидии у бисексуальных животных // Генетика. Т. 5. № 7. С. 129–149.
  2. Банников А.Г., Даревский И.С., Ищенко В., Рустамов А.К, Щербак Н.Н., 1977. Определитель земноводных и пресмыкающихся фауны СССР. М.: Просвещение. 414 с.
  3. Боркин Л.Я., Даревский И.С., 1980. Сетчатое (гибридогенное) видообразование у позвоночных // Журнал Общей Биологии. Т. 41. № 4. С. 485–506.
  4. Васильев В.П., Васильева Е.Д., 1982. Новый диплоиднополиплоидный комплекс у рыб // Доклады АН СССР. Т. 266. № 1. С. 250–252.
  5. Галоян Э.А., 2010. Распределение партеногенетических скальных ящериц Darevskia armeniaca и Darevskia unisexualis в северной Армении и сравнение с бисексуальными видами // Зоологический журнал. Т. 89. № 4. С. 470–474.
  6. Галоян Э.А., 2013. Межвидовые и внутривидовые интерсексуальные взаимоотношения у скальных ящериц рода Darevskia // Статьи по материалам докладов Первой международной молодежной конференции герпетологов России и сопредельных стран. Зоологический институт РАН. СПб. С. 61–66.
  7. Гребельный С.Д., 2005. Много ли на свете клональных видов. Часть 1. Отличие клональных форм от обычных двуполых видов // Журнал зоологии беспозвоночных. Т. 2. № 1. С. 79–102.
  8. Даниелян Ф.Д., 1970. Нарушения эмбрионального развития и появление уродств у скальных ящериц Армении // Зоологический журнал. Т. 49. № 7. С. 1064–1068.
  9. Даниелян Ф.Д., 1971. Сравнительное изучение численности и миграций партеногенетических и бисексуальных скальных ящериц в Армянской ССР // Зоологический журнал. Т. 10. Вып. 1. С. 145–147.
  10. Даниелян Ф.Д., 1987. Изучение смешанной популяции трех партеногенетических видов скальных ящериц (Lacerta saxicola complex) в Армении // Труды Зоологического института АН СССР. Т. 158. С. 77–83.
  11. Даниелян Ф.Д., Аракелян М.С., Спангенберг В.Е., 2018. Изучение гибридных триплоидных самцов скальных ящериц рода Darevskia в симпатрической популяции Армении // Биологический журнал Армении. Т. 2. № 70. С. 64–71.
  12. Даревский И.С., 1957. Систематика и экология скальных ящериц Lacerta saxicola Eversmann, распространенных в Армении // Зоологический сборник Академия наук Армянской ССР. T. 10. C. 27–58.
  13. Даревский И.С., 1958. Естественный партеногенез у некоторых подвидов скальной ящерицы (Lacerta saxicola Eversmann), распространенных в Армении // Доклады АН СССР. Т. 122. № 4. С. 730–732.
  14. Даревский И.С., 1962. О происхождении и биологической роли естественного партеногенеза в полиморфной группе кавказских скальных ящериц (Lacerta saxicola Evermann) // Зоологический журнал. Т. 18. № 3. С. 397–408.
  15. Даревский И.С., Куликова В.Н., 1962. Систематические признаки и некоторые особенности оогенеза гибридов между обоеполой и партеногенетической формами скальной ящерицы Lacerta saxicola Eversmann // Цитология. № 42. С. 160–170.
  16. Даревский И.С., 1967. Скальные ящерицы Кавказа: Систематика, экология и филогения полиморфной группы кавказских ящериц подрода Archaeolacerta. Зоологический институт. Ленинград: Наука. Ленингр. отд. 214 с.
  17. Даревский И.С., Даниелян Ф.Д., 1969. Диплоидные и триплоидные особи в потомстве партеногенетических самок скальной ящерицы, естественно спаривавшихся с самцами близких бисексуальных видов // Доклады АН СССР. Т. 184. № 3. С. 727–730.
  18. Даревский И.С., Аззелл Т.М., 1973. Биохимические доказательства гибридного происхождения партеногенетических видов скальных ящериц рода Lacerta. В кн.: Отчетная научная сессия по итогам работ 1972 года, 12–14 марта 1973 г. Тезисы докладов. Ленинград: Наука, Ленинградское отделение. С. 8–9.
  19. Даревский И.С., Аззелл Т.М., Куприянова. Л.А., Даниелян Ф.Д., 1973. Гибридные триплоидные самцы в симпатрических популяциях партеногенетических и обоеполых видов скальных ящериц рода Lacerta L. // Бюллетень Московского общества испытателей природы. Отдел биологический. № 781. С. 48–58.
  20. Даревский И.С., Куприянова Л.А., Бакрадзе М.А., 1977. Остаточная бисексуальность у партеногенетических видов скальных ящериц // Журнал общей биологии. Т. 38. № 5. С. 772–780.
  21. Даревский И.С., Гречко В.В., Куприянова Л.A., 2000. Ящерицы, размножающиеся без самцов // Природа. № 9. С. 131–133.
  22. Куприянова Л.А., Сафронова Л.Д., Сычева В.Б., Даниелян Ф.Д., Петросян В.Г., 2021. Оогенез (профаза I мейоза) и митотические хромосомы партеногенетического вида Darevskia armeniaca (Семейство Lacertidae) // Известия РАН. Серия биологическая. № 3. С. 141–148.
  23. Осипов Ф.А., Бобров В.В., Дергунова Н.Н., Аракелян М.С., Петросян В.Г., 2023. Анализ ширины экологических ниш партеногенетических ящериц рода Darevskia (Lacertidae, Reptilia) с различными сценариями формирования клональных линий в популяциях // Современная герпетология. Т. 23. № 3/4. С. 108–112.
  24. Тагиров М.Т., 2013. Механизмы контроля и детерминации пола у птиц // Biotechnologia Acta. Т. 6. № 1. С. 62–72.
  25. Трофимов А.Г., 1981. Пространственная структура популяций некоторых партеногенетических и двуполых скальных ящериц Кавказа. Дис. … канд. биол. наук. Киев. 170 с.
  26. Целлариус Е.Ю., Целлариус А.Ю., 2005. Использования пространства и социальные отношения у скальной ящерицы – Lacerta saxicola (Reptilia, Sauria) // Современная Герпетология. Т. 3/4. С. 99–110.
  27. Целлариус А.Ю., Целлариус Е.Ю., Галоян Э.А., 2017. Социальные отношения между самцами и самками у скальной ящерицы (Lacertidae). 3. Конкуренция самок и её роль в формировании интерсексуальных дружественных взаимоотношений // Зоологический журнал. Т. 96. № 4. С. 439–448.
  28. Шилов А.И., 2003. Экология. М.: Высшая школа. 512 с.
  29. Abrahamyan M.R., Petrosyan R.K., Galoyan E.A., Danielyan F.D., Arakelyan M.S., 2014. Seasonal and daily activities of two syntopic parthenogenetic lizards of genus Darevskia // Chemistry and Biology. № 2. P. 39–42.
  30. Adams M., Foster R., Hutchinson M.N., Hutchinson R.G., Donnellan S.С., 2003. The Australian scincid lizard Menetia greyii: a new instance of widespread vertebrate parthenogenesis // Evolution. V. 57. № 11. P. 2619–2627.
  31. Alvarez G., Salas E.A.L., Harings N.M., Boykin K.G., 2017. Projections of future suitable bioclimatic conditions of parthenogenetic whiptails // Climate. V. 5. № 2. P. 34.
  32. Alves M., Coelho M., Collares-Pereira M., 2001. Evolution in action through hybridisation and polyploidy in an Iberian freshwater fish: a genetic review // Genetica. V. 111. P. 375–385.
  33. Arakelyan M., Harutyunyan T., Aghayan S.A., Carretero M.A., 2019. Infection of parthenogenetic lizards by blood parasites does not support the “Red Queen hypothesis” but reveals the costs of sex // Zoology (Jena). № 136. P. 125709.
  34. Arakelyan M., Spangenberg V., Petrosyan V., Ryskov A., Kolomiets O., Galoyan E., 2023. Evolution of parthenogenetic reproduction in Caucasian rock lizards: A review // Current Zoology. V. 69, Issue 2. P. 128–135.
  35. Arribas O.J., 1999. Phylogeny and relationships of the mountain lizards of Europe and Near East (Archaeolacerta Mertens, 1921, Sensu Lato) and their relationships among the Eurasian lacertid radiation // Russian Journal of Herpetology. V. 6. № 1. P. 1–22.
  36. Avila L.J., Martori R.A., 1991. A unisexual species of Teius Merrem 1820 (Sauria Teiidae) from central Argentina // Tropical Zoology. V. 4. № 2. P. 193–201.
  37. Avise J.С., 2008. Clonality: The Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution of Sexual Abstinence in Vertebrate Animals. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 250 p.
  38. Baker H.G., 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants // Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. V. 24. P. 177–191.
  39. Barateli N., Gabelaia M., Iankoshvili G., Tarkhnishvili D., 2024. Head shape divergence between parthenogenetic and their paternal bisexual rock lizards in sympatry // Zoologischer Anzeiger. V. 311. P. 62–68.
  40. Barley A.J., Nieto-Montes de Oca A., Reeder T.W., Manríquez-Morán N.L., Arenas Monroy J.C., Hernández-Gallegos O., Thomson R.C., 2019. Complex patterns of hybridization and introgression across evolutionary timescales in Mexican whiptail lizards (Aspidoscelis) // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. V. 132. P. 284–295.
  41. Barley A.J., Reeder T.W., Nieto-Montes de Oca A., Cole C.J., Thomson R.C., 2021. A new diploid parthenogenetic whiptail lizard from Sonora, Mexico, is the “Missing link” in the evolutionary transition to polyploidy // American Naturalist. V. 198. № 2. P. 295–309.
  42. Barley A.J., Nieto-Montes de Oca A., Manríquez-Morán N.L., Thomson R.C., 2022. The evolutionary network of whiptail lizards reveals predictable outcomes of hybridization // Science. V. 377. № 6607. P. 773–777.
  43. Barley A.J., Cordes J.E., Walker J.M., Thomson R.C., 2022a. Genetic diversity and the origins of parthenogenesis in the teiid lizard Aspidoscelis laredoensis // Molecular Ecology. V. 31 № 1. P. 266–278.
  44. Bezy R.L., 1972. Karyotypic variation and evolution of the lizards in the family Xantusiidae // Contributions in Science. V. 227. P. 1–29.
  45. Billy A.J., 1990. Why do parthenogenetic lizards hybridize with sympatric bisexual relatives? // Evolutionary Theory. V. 9. P. 225–238.
  46. Bogart J.P., Bi K., Fu J., Noble D.W., Niedzwiecki J., 2007. Unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) present a new reproductive mode for eukaryotes // Genome. V. 50. № 2. P. 119–136.
  47. Bohme W., 1982. Über Schmetterlingsagamen, Leiolepis b. belliana (Gray 1827) der Malayischen Halbinsel und ihre parthenogenetischen Linien (Sauria: Uromastycidae) // Zoologische Jahrbücher. V. 109 (2). P. 157–169.
  48. Bracken M.F., 1978. The relation of rank to physiological state in Cnemidophorus sexlineatus dominate hierarchy // Herpetologica V. 34. № 2. P. 185–191.
  49. Brunes T.O., da Silva A.J., Marques-Souza S., Rodrigues M.T., Pellegrino K.C.M., 2019. Not always young: The first vertebrate ancient origin of true parthenogenesis found in an Amazon leaf litter lizard with evidence of mitochondrial haplotypes surfing on the wave of a range expansion // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. V. 135. P. 105–122.
  50. Cacciali P., Morando M., Köhler G., Avila L., 2016. On the distribution of the genus Teius Merrem, 1820 (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae) // Zootaxa. V. 4136. № 3. P. 491–514.
  51. Capula M., 1993. Natural hybridization in Podarcis sicula and P. wagleriana (Reptilia: Lacertidae) // Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. V. 21. P. 373–380.
  52. Capula M., 2002. Genetic evidence of natural hybridization between Podarcis sicula and Podarcis tiliguerta (Reptilia: Lacertidae) // Amphibia-Reptilia. V. 23. P. 313–321.
  53. Carvalho N.D.M., Arias F.J., da Silva F.A., Schneider C.H., Gross M.C., 2015. Cytogenetic analyses of five amazon lizard species of the subfamilies Teiinae and Tupinambinae and review of karyotyped diversity the family Teiidae // Comparative Cytogenetics. V. 9. № 4. P. 625–644.
  54. Cole C.J., 1979. Chromosome inheritance in parthenogenetic lizards and evolution of allopolyploidy in reptiles // Journal of Heredity. V. 70. P. 95–102.
  55. Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., Barrowclough G.F., 1988. Hybrid origin of a unisexual species of whiptail lizard, Cnemidophorus neomexicanus, in western North America: New evidence and a review // American Museum Novitates. V. 2905. P. 1–38.
  56. Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., Markezich A.L., 1993. Missing link found: The second ancestor of Gymnophthalmus underwoodi (Squamata: Teiidae), a South American unisexual lizard of hybrid origin // American Museum Novitates. V. 3055. P. 1–13.
  57. Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., 1993. Unisexual and bisexual whiptail lizards of the Cnemidophorus lemniscatus complex (Squamata: Teiidae) of the Guiana Region, South America, with descriptions of new species // American Museum Novitates. V. 3081. P. 1–30.
  58. Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., 1995. Unisexual lizards (genus Cnemidophorus) of the Madrean Archipelago. In L.F. DeBano, P.F. Pfolliott, A. Ortego-Rubio, G.J. Gottfried, R.H. Hamre, and C.B. Edminster (technical coordinators), Biodiversity and management of the Madrean Archipelago: the sky islands of southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico: 267–273. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO, General Technical Report RM-GTR-264.
  59. Cole C.J., Hardy L.M., Dessauer H.C., Taylor H.L., Townsend C.R., 2010. Laboratory hybridization among North American whiptail lizards, including Aspidoscelis inornata arizonae × A. tigris marmorata (Squamata: Teiidae), ancestors of unisexual clones in nature // American Museum Novitates. V. 3698. P. 1–44.
  60. Cole C.J., Taylor H.L., Baumann D.P., Baumann P., 2014. “Neaves’ whiptail lizard: The first known tetraploid parthenogenetic tetrapod (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae) // Breviora. V. 539. № 1. 1–20.
  61. Cole C.J., Taylor H.L., Neaves W.B., Baumann D.P., Newton A., et al., 2017. The second known tetraploid species of parthenogenetic tetrapod (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae): Description, reproduction, comparisons with ancestral taxa, and origins of multiple clones // Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. V. 161. № 8. P. 285–321.
  62. Cole C.J., Cordes J.E., Walker J.M., 2019. Karyotypes of the North American parthenogenetic whiptail lizard Aspidoscelis velox, and return of Aspidoscelis innotatus to the synonymy of A. velox (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae) // American Museum Novitates. V. 3936. P. 1–8.
  63. Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., Paulissen M.A., Walker J.M., 2020. Hybridization between whiptail lizards in Texas: Aspidoscelis laredoensis and A. gularis, with notes on reproduction of a hybrid // American Museum Novitates. V. 3947. P. 1–13.
  64. Cole C.J., Baumann D.P., Taylor H.L., Bobon N., Ho D.V., et al., 2023. Reticulate phylogeny: A new tetraploid parthenogenetic whiptail lizard derived from hybridization among four bisexual ancestral species of Aspidoscelis (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae) // Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. V. 163. № 7. P. 247–275.
  65. Cosentino B.J., Schooley R.L., Bestelmeyer B.T. et al., 2019. Does habitat disturbance promote geographical parthenogenesis in whiptail lizards? // Evolutionary Ecology. V. 33. P. 839–853.
  66. Crews D., Young L.J., 1991. Pseudocopulation in nature in a unisexual whiptail lizard // Animal Behaviour. V. 42. № 3. P. 512–514.
  67. Cristián A.S., Baldo D., Juárez R.A., Espinoza R.E., 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont iguanian: A new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from Western Argentina // Copeia. V. 104. № 2. P. 487–497.
  68. Cuellar O., 1971. Reproduction and the mechanism of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens // Journal of Morphology. V. 133. № 2. P. 139–165.
  69. Cuellar O., Kluge A.G., 1972. Natural parthenogenesis in the gekkonid lizard Lepidodactulus lugubris // Journal of Genetetics. V. 61. P. 14–26.
  70. Cuellar O., McKinney C.O., 1976. Natural hybridization between parthenogenetic and bisexual lizards: detection of uniparental source of skin grafting // Journal of Experimental Zoology. V. 196. № 3. P. 341–350.
  71. Cuellar O., 1979. On the ecology of coexistence in parthenogenetic and bisexual lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus // American Zoologist. V. 19. № 3. P. 773–786.
  72. Danielyan F., Arakelyan M., Stepanyan I., 2008. Hybrids of Darevskia valentini, D. armeniaca and D. unisexualis from a sympatric population in Armenia // Amphibia-Reptilia. V. 29. P. 487–504.
  73. Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., Bakradze M.A., 1978. Occasional males and intersexes in parthenogenetic species of Caucasian rock lizards (genus Lacerta) // Copeia. V. 2. P. 201–207.
  74. Darevskii I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., 1982. Rare males in parthenogenetic lizard Lacerta armeniaca Méhely // Vertebr. Hung. V. 21. P. 69–75.
  75. Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., Roshchin V.V., 1984. A new all-female triploid species of gecko and karyological data on the bisexual Hemidactylus frenatus from Vietnam // Journal of Herpetology. V. 18. № 3. P. 277.
  76. Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., Uzell T., 1985. Parthenogenesis in reptiles. In: Dawley R.M., Bogart J.P., eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York: The New York State Museum. V. 466. Р. 411–526.
  77. Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., 1993. Two new all-female lizard species of the genus Leiolepis Cuvier, 1829 from Thailand and Vietnam (Squamata: Sauria: Uromastycinae) // Herpetozoa. V. 6. № 1–2. P. 3–20.
  78. Dawley R.M., Bogart J.С., 1989. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates, New York: New York State Museum. № 466. 302 p.
  79. Dedukh D., Majtánová Z., Marta A., Pšenička M., Kotusz J., et al., 2020. Parthenogenesis as a solution to hybrid sterility: The mechanistic basis of meiotic distortions in clonal and sterile hybrids // Genetics. V. 215. № 4. P. 975–987.
  80. Dedukh D., Altmanová M., Klíma J., Kratochvíl L., 2022. Premeiotic endoreplication is essential for obligate parthenogenesis in geckos // Development. V. 149. № 7. P. dev200345.
  81. Dedukh D., Marta A., Myung R.Y. et al., 2024. A cyclical switch of gametogenic pathways in hybrids depends on the ploidy level // Communication Biology. V. 7. P. 424.
  82. Dedukh D., Altmanová M., Petrosyan R., Arakelyan M., Galoyan E., Kratochvíl L., 2024а. Premeiotic endoreplication is the mechanism of obligate parthenogenesis in rock lizards of the genus Darevskia // Biology Letters. V. 20. № 9. P. 20240182.
  83. Dessauer H.C., Cole C.J., 1989. Diversity between and within nominal forms of unisexual teiid lizards. In: Dawley R.M., and Bogart J.P., eds. Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates. New York: The New York State Museum. V. 466. P. 49–71.
  84. Deso G., Probst J-M., Dubos N., 2020. The widespread Indo-Pacific slender gecko Hemiphyllodactylus typus: a single species across the Oceans? // Bulletin Phaethon. V. 51. P. 38–41.
  85. Dukić M., Berner D., Haag C.R., Ebert D., 2019. How clonal are clones? A quest for loss of heterozygosity during asexual reproduction in Daphnia magna // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. V. 32. № 6. P. 619–628.
  86. Erdolu M., Şahin M.K., Somel M., Yanchukov A., 2023. Single hybrid population but multiple parental individuals at the origin of parthenogenetic rock lizards Darevskia sapphirina and D. bendimahiensis Schmidtler, & Eiselt Darevsky (1994) endemic to the area of Lake Van in East Turkey // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. V. 189. P. 107925.
  87. Espeche B.A., Brigada A.M., Rivera P.C., 2023. Morphometric variability in lizards of the genus Teius: A comparative study of species with different reproductive modes // Journal of Herpetology. V. 57. № 2. P. 238–245.
  88. Freitas S., Rocha S., Campos J.C., Ahmadzadeh F., Corti C., et al., 2016. Parthenogenesis through the Ice Ages: A biogeographic analysis of Caucasian rock lizards (genus Darevskia) // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. V. 102. P. 117–127.
  89. Freitas S., Westram A.M., Schwander T., Arakelyan M., Ilgaz Ç., et al., 2022. Parthenogenesis in Darevskia lizards: A rare outcome of common hybridization, not a common outcome of rare hybridization // Evolution. V. 76. № 5. P. 899–914.
  90. Freitas S., Parker D.J., Labédan M., Dumas Z., Schwander T., 2023. Evidence for cryptic sex in parthenogenetic stick insects of the genus Timema // Proceedings of Biological Sciences. V. 290. P. 20230404.
  91. Fu J., McCulloch R.D., Murphy R.W., Darevsky I.S., 2000. Clonal variation in the Caucasian rock lizard Lacerta armeniaca and its origin // Amphibia-Reptilia. V. 21. P. 83–89.
  92. Fujita M.K., Moritz C., 2009. Origin and evolution of parthenogenetic genomes in lizards: current state and future directions // Cytogenetic and Genome Research. V. 127. № 2–4. P. 261–272.
  93. Fujita M.K., Singhal S., Brunes T.O., Maldonado J.A., 2020. Evolutionary dynamics and consequences of parthenogenesis in vertebrates // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. V. 51. P. 191–214.
  94. Fyon F., Berbel-Filho W.M., Schlupp I., Wild G., Úbeda F., 2023. Why do hybrids turn down sex? // Evolution. V. 77. № 10. P. 2186–2199.
  95. Gabelaia M., Adriaens D., Tarkhnishvili D., 2017. Phylogenetic signals in scale shape in Caucasian rock lizards (Darevskia species) // Zoologisher Anzeiger. V. 268. P. 32–40.
  96. Galoyan E.A., 2013. Joint space use in a parthenogenetic Armenian rock lizard (Darevskia armeniaca) suggests weak competition among monoclonal females // Journal of Herpetology. V. 47. № 1. P. 97–104.
  97. Galoyan E., Bolshakova A., Abrahamyan M., Petrosyan R., Komarova V., et al., 2019. Natural history of Valentin’s rock lizard (Darevskia valentini) in Armenia // Zoological Research. V. 40. № 4. P. 277–292.
  98. Galoyan E.A., Tsellarius E.Y., Arakelyan M.S., 2019a. Friend-or-foe? Behavioural evidence suggests interspecific discrimination leading to low probability of hybridization in two coexisting rock lizard species (Lacertidae, Darevskia). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. V. 73. P. 46.
  99. Galoyan E., Moskalenko V., Gabelaia M., Tarkhnishvili D., Spangenverg V.E., Chamkina A., Arakelyan M., 2020. Syntopy of two species of rock lizards (Darevskia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii) may not lead to hybridization between them // Zoologisher Anzeiger. V. 288. P. 43–52.
  100. Galoyan E.A., Sopilko N.G., Kovalyeva A.V., Nikolaev O.D., Iryshkov E.S., et al., 2024. Love bites: Males of lizards prefer to mate with conspecifics, but do not disdain parthenogens // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. blae057.
  101. Galoyan E.A., Nazarov R.A., Altmanová M., Matveevsky S., Kropachev I. et al. Natural repeated backcrosses lead to triploidy and tetraploidy in parthenogenetic butterfly lizards (Leiolepis: Agamidae) // Scientific Reports. In print.
  102. Girnyk A.E., Vergun A.A., Semyenova S.K., Guliaev A.S., Arakelyan M.S., Danielyan F.D., et al., 2018. Multiple interspecific hybridization and microsatellite mutations provide clonal diversity in the parthenogenetic rock lizard Darevskia armeniaca // BMC Genomics. V. 19. № 1. P. 979.
  103. Good D.A., Wright J.W., 1984. Allozymes and the hybrid origin of the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus exsanguis // Experientia. V. 40. P. 1012–1014.
  104. Gopinathan L., Szmyd R., Low D., Diril M.K., Chang H.Y., Coppola V., Liu K., et al., 2017. Emi2 is essential for mouse spermatogenesis // Cell Reproduction. V. 20. № 3. P. 697–708.
  105. Grant V., 1971. Plant Speciation. 1st edition. New York: Columbia University Press. 435 p.
  106. Greenwald K.R., Robert D., Denton R.D., Gibbs L.H., 2016. Niche partitioning among sexual and unisexual Ambystoma salamanders // Ecosphere. V. 7. № . 11. e01579.
  107. Grismer J.L., Grismer L.L., 2010. Who’s your mommy? Identifying maternal ancestors of asexual species of Leiolepis Cuvier, 1829 and the description of a new endemic species of asexual Leiolepis Cuvier, 1829 from Southern Vietnam // Zootaxa. V. 2433. P. 47–61.
  108. Grismer J.L., Bauer A.M., Grismer L.L., Thirakhupt K., Aowphol A., Oaks J.R., et al., 2014. Multiple origins of parthenogenesis, and a revised species phylogeny for the Southeast Asian butterfly lizards, Leiolepis // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 113. № 4. P. 1080–1093.
  109. Hall W.P., 1970. Three probable cases of parthenogenesis in lizards (Agamidae, Chameleonidae, Gekkonidae) // Experientia. V. 26. № 11. P. 1271–1273.
  110. Hernando A.B., 1994. Cariotipo y región organizadora del núcleo en Teius teyou (Daudin, 1802) (Squamata: teiidae) // Cuadernos de Herpetología. V. 8. № 1. P. 87–89.
  111. Ho D.V., Tormey D., Odell A., Newton A.A., Schnittker R.R., Baumann D.P., et al., 2024. Post-meiotic mechanism of facultative parthenogenesis in gonochoristic whiptail lizard species // Elife. V. 7. № 13. P. e97035.
  112. Itono M., Morishima K., Fujimoto T., Bando E., Yamaha E., Arai K., 2006. Premeiotic endomitosis produces diploid eggs in the natural clone loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Teleostei: Cobitidae) // Journal of Experimental Zoology and Comparative Experimental Biology. V. 305. № 6. P. 513–523.
  113. Janko K., Bohlen J., Lamatsch D., Flajšhans M., Epplen J.T., Ráb P., et al., 2007. The gynogenetic reproduction of diploid and triploid hybrid spined loaches (Cobitis: Teleostei), and their ability to establish successful clonal lineages – on the evolution of polyploidy in asexual vertebrates // Genetica. V. 131. P. 185–194.
  114. Janko K., Pačes J., Wilkinson‐Herbots H., Costa R.J., Roslein J., Drozd P., et al., 2018. Hybrid asexuality as a primary postzygotic barrier between nascent species: On the interconnection between asexuality, hybridization and speciation // Molecular Ecology. V. 27. № 1. P. 248–263.
  115. Jia J.L., Han Y.H., Kim H.C., Ahn M., Kwon J.W., Luo Y., et al., 2015. Structural basis for recognition of Emi2 by Polo-like kinase 1 and development of peptidomimetics blocking oocyte maturation and fertilization // Scientific Reports. V. 3. № 5. P. 14626.
  116. Karin B.R., Oliver P.M., Stubbs A.L., Arifin U., Iskandar D.T., Arida E., et al., 2021. Who’s your daddy? On the identity and distribution of the paternal hybrid ancestor of the parthenogenetic gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) // Zootaxa. V. 4999. № 1. P. 87–100.
  117. Kearney M., Moussalli A., Strasburg J., Lindenmayer D., Moritz С., 2003. Geographic parthenogenesis in the Australian arid zone: I. A climatic analysis of the Heteronotia binoei complex (Gekkonidae) // Evolutionary Ecology Research. V. 5. № 7. P. 953–976.
  118. Kearney M., Shine R., 2004. Morphological and physiological correlates of hybrid parthenogenesis // American Naturalist. V. 164. № 6. P. 803–813.
  119. Kearney M., 2005. Hybridization, glaciation and geographical parthenogenesis // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. V. 20. № 9. P. 495–502.
  120. Kearney M., Fujita M.K., Ridenour J., 2009. Lost sex in reptiles: Constraints and correlations. In I. Schön, K. Martens, P. van Dijk Eds. Lost sex: The evolutionary biology of parthenogenesis. New York: Sprinter Scientific. P. 447–474.
  121. Kočí J., Röslein J., Pačes J., Kotusz J., Halačka K., Koščo J., et al., 2020. No evidence for accumulation of deleterious mutations and fitness degradation in clonal fish hybrids: Abandoning sex without regrets // Molecular Ecology. V. 29. № 16. P. 3038–3055.
  122. Korchagin V.I., Badaeva T.N., Tokarskaya O.N., Martirosyan I.A., Darevsky I.S., Ryskov A.P., 2007. Molecular characterization of allelic variants of (GATA)n microsatellite loci in parthenogenetic lizards Darevskia unisexualis (Lacertidae) // Gene. V. 392. № 1–2. P. 126–133.
  123. Krebs C.J., 1978. Ecology. The experimental analyses of distribution and abundance/ Second edition. New York: Harper and Row Publishers. 653 p.
  124. Krebs C.J., 2002. Beyond population regulation and limitation // Wildlife Research. V. 29. P. 1–10.
  125. Kropachev I., Tarkhnishvili D., Murtskhvaladze M., Galoyan E., 2023. Living apart together: Morphological, spatial, and genetic differentiation of three sympatric rock lizard species (Lacertidae: Darevskia) of the Caucasus // Zoologischer Anzeiger. V. 303. P. 71–79.
  126. Kupriyanova L., 1994. Structure, localization and stability of chromosome in karyotype evolution in lizards of the Lacertidae family // Russian Journal of Herpetology. V. 1. P. 1–12.
  127. Kuroda M., Fujimoto T., Murakami M., Yamaha E., Arai K., 2018. Clonal reproduction assured by sister chromosome pairing in dojo loach, a teleost fish // Chromosome Research. V. 26. P. 243–253.
  128. Laguna M.M., Rodrigues M.T., dos Santos R.M.L, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y., Ávila-Pires T.C.S., et al., 2010. Karyotypes of a cryptic diploid form of the unisexual Leposoma percarinatum (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) and the bisexual Leposoma ferreirai from the Lower Rio Negro, Amazonian Brazil // Journal of Herpetology. V. 44. № 1. P. 153–157.
  129. Lamborot M., Vasquez M., 1998. A triploid lizard (Liolaemus gravenhorsti) from Chile // Journal of Herpetology. V. 32. P. 617–620.
  130. Lampert K.P., 2009. Facultative parthenogenesis in vertebrates: reproductive error or chance? // Sexual Development. V. 2. № 6. P. 290–301.
  131. Leuck B.E., 1985. Comparative social behavior of bisexual and unisexual whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus) // Journal of Herpetology. V. 19. № 4. P. 492–506.
  132. Lotsy J.P., 1925. Species or linneon // Genetica. V. 7. P. 487–506.
  133. Lowe C.H., Wright J.W., 1966. Evolution of parthenogenetic species of Cnemidophorus, whiptail lizards, in western North America // Journal of Arizona Academy of Science. V. 4. P. 81–87.
  134. Lowe C.J., Wright J.W., Cole C.J., Bezy R.L., 1970. Natural hybridization between the Teiid lizards Cnemidophorus sonorae (parthenogenetic) and Cnemidophorus tigris (bisexual) // Systematic Biology. V. 19. № 2. P. 114–127.
  135. Lutes A.A., Neaves W.B., Baumann D.P., Wiegraebe W., Baumann P., 2010. Sister chromosome pairing maintains heterozygosity in parthenogenetic lizards // Nature. V. 464. № 7286. P. 283–286.
  136. Lutes A.A., Baumann D.P., Neaves W.B., Baumann P., 2011. Laboratory synthesis of an independently reproducing vertebrate species // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. V. 108. № 24. P. 9910–9915.
  137. Lynch M., Bürger R., Butcher D., Gabriel W., 1993. The mutational meltdown in asexual populations // Journal of Heredity. V. 84. P. 339–344.
  138. Macgregor H.C., Uzzell T.M., 1964. Gynogenesis in salamanders related to Ambystoma jeffersonianum // Science. V. 143. P. 1043–1045.
  139. MacCulloch R.D., Upton D.E., Murphy R.W., 1996. Trends in nuclear DNA content among amphibians and reptiles // Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. V. 113. № 3. P. 601–605.
  140. Malysheva D.N., Tokarskaya O.N., Petrosyan V.G., Danielyan F.D., Darevsky I.S., Ryskov A.P., 2007. Genomic variation in parthenogenetic lizard Darevskia armeniaca: evidence from DNA fingerprinting data // Journal of Heredity. V. 98. № 2. P. 173–178.
  141. Mandegar M.A., Otto S.P., 2007. Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation // Proceedings of the Royal Society B‐Biological Sciences. V. 274. P. 1301–1307.
  142. Manríquez Morán N.L., Villagrán Santa Cruz M., Méndez de la Cruz F.R., 2000. Origin and evolution of the parthenogenetic lizards, Cnemidophorus maslini and C. cozumela // Journal of Herpetology. V. 34. P. 634–637.
  143. Manríquez Morán N.L., Norma L., Méndez de la Cruz F.R., 2012. Origin and clonal diversity of the parthenogenetic lizard Aspidoscelis rodecki (Squamata: Teiidae): chromosomal evidence // Phyllomedusa. V. 11 № 1. P. 29–36.
  144. Marta A., Tichopád T., Bartoš O., Klíma J., Shah M.A., Bohlen V.Š., et al., 2023. Genetic and karyotype divergence between parents affect clonality and sterility in hybrids // Elife. V. 6. № 12. P. RP88366.
  145. Matsubara K., Kumazawa Y., Ota H., Nishida C., Matsuda Y., 2019. Karyotype analysis of four blind snake species (Reptilia: Squamata: Scolecophidia) and karyotypic changes in serpentes // Cytogenet. Genome Res. V. 157. № 1–2. P. 98–106.
  146. Maynard Smith J., 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  147. McMahan C.D., Zug G.R., 2007. Burmese Hemidactylus (Reptilia, Squamata, Gekkonidae): geographic variation in the morphology of Hemidactylus bowringii in Myanmar and Yunnan // Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences. V. 58. № 24. P. 485–509.
  148. Moreira M.O., Fonseca C., Rojas D., 2021. Parthenogenesis is self-destructive for scaled reptiles // Biological Letters. V. 17. № 5. P. 20210006.
  149. Moritz C., 1983. Parthenogenesis in the endemic Australian lizard Heteronotia binoei (Gekkonidae) // Science. V. 220. P. 735–737.
  150. Moritz C., 1984. The origin and evolution of parthenogenesis in Heteronotia binoei (Gekkonidae) // Chromosoma. V. 89. P. 151–162.
  151. Moritz C., 1987. Parthenogenesis in the tropical gekkonid lizard, Nactus arnouxii (Sauria: gekkonidae) // Evolution. V. 41. № 6. P. 1252.
  152. Moritz C.C., Wright J.W., Brown W.M., 1989. Mitochondrial-DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards (genus Сnemidophorus). III. C. velox and C. exsanguis // Evolution. V. 43. № 5. P. 958–968.
  153. Moritz C., 1991. The origin and evolution of parthenogenesis in Heteronotia binoei (Gekkonidae): Evidence for recent and localized origins of widespread clones // Genetics. V. 129. № 1. P. 211–219.
  154. Moritz C., McCallum H., Donnellan S., Roberts J., 1991. Parasite loads in parthenogenetic and sexual lizards (Heteronotia binoei): Support for the Red Queen hypothesis // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. V. 244. P. 145–149.
  155. Moritz C., Uzzell T., Spolsky C., Hotz H., Darevsky I.S., et al., 1992. The material ancestry and approximate age of parthenogenetic species of Caucasian rock lizards (Lacerta: Lacertidae) // Genetica. V. 87. P. 53–62.
  156. Muller H.J., 1932. Some genetic aspects of sex // American Naturalist. V. 66. № 703. P. 118–138.
  157. Murphy R.W., Fu J., Macculloch R.D., Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., 2000. A fine line between sex and unisexuality: the phylogenetic constraints on parthenogenesis in lacertid lizards // Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 130. № 4. P. 527–549.
  158. Neaves W.B., Gerald P.S., 1968. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in parthenogenetic teiid lizards (Cnemidophorus) // Science. V. 160. P. 1004–1005.
  159. Neaves W.B., 1969. Adenosine deaminase phenotypes among sexual and parthenogenetic lizards in the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae) // Journal of Experimental Zoolology. V. 171. P. 175–184.
  160. Neaves W.B., Gerald P.S., 1969. Gene dosage at the lactate dehydrogenase b locus in triploid and diploid teiid lizards // Science. V. 164. № 3879. P. 557–559.
  161. Neaves W.B., 1971. Tetraploidy in a hybrid lizard of the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae) // Breviora. V. 381. P. 1–25.
  162. Newton A.A., Schnittker R.R., Yu Z., Munday S.S., Baumann D.P., Neaves W.B., et al., 2016. Widespread failure to complete meiosis does not impair fecundity in parthenogenetic whiptail lizards // Development. V. 143. № 23. P. 4486–4494.
  163. Ohe M., Kawamura Y., Ueno H., Inoue D., Kanemori Y., Senoo C., et al., 2010. Emi2 inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome absolutely requires Emi2 binding via the C-terminal RL tail // Molecular Biology of the Cell. V. 21. № 6. 905–913.
  164. Orr-Weaver T.L., 2015. When bigger is better: The role of polyploidy in organogenesis // Trends in Genetics. V. 31. P. 307–315.
  165. Osipov F.A., Vergun A.A., Arakelyan M.S., Petrosyan R.K., Dergunova N.N., et al., 2021. Genetic variability and the potential range of Darevskia rostombekowi in Transcaucasia // Biological Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. V. 48. P. 681–692.
  166. Ota H., Hikida T., Lue K.Y., 1989. Polyclony in a triploid gecko, Hemidactylus stejnegeri, from Taiwan, with notes on its bearing on the chromosomal diversity of the H. garnotii-vietnamensis complex (Sauria: Gekkonidae) // Genetica. V. 79. P. 183–189.
  167. Ota H., Darevsky I.S., Kupriyanova L.A., Hikida T., Lue K.-Y., Chen S.-H., Hayashi T., 1993. Geographic variation in the parthenogenetic lizard, Hemidactylus stejnegeri Ota & Hikida 1989 (Gekkonidae Reptilia), with comments on recently discovered male phenotypes // Tropical Zoology. V. 6. № 1. P. 125–142.
  168. Ota H., Hikida T., Matsui M., Chan-Ard T., Nabhitabhata J., 1996. Discovery of a diploid population of the Hemidactylus garnotii-vietnamensis complex (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) // Genetica. V. 97. P. 81–85.
  169. Parker E.D., Selander R.K. Jr., 1976. The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus // Genetics. V. 84. P. 791–805.
  170. Parker E.D., Walker J.M., Paulissen M.A., 1989. Clonal diversity in Cnemidophorus: ecological and morphological consequences. In: Dawley R.M., Bogart J.P., eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York: The New York State Museum. V. 466. P. 72–86.
  171. Pennock L.A., 1965. Triploid in parthenogenetic species of the teiid lizard, genus Cnemidophorus // Science. V. 149. № 3683. P. 539–540.
  172. Peters G., 1971. Die intragenerischen Gruppen und die Phylogenese der Schmetterlingsagamen (Agamidae: Leiolepis) // Zoologische Jahrbücher. V. 98. P. 130.
  173. Petrosyan V., Osipov F., Bobrov V., Dergunova N., Nazarenko E., et al., 2019. Analysis of geographical distribution of the parthenogenetic rock lizard Darevskia armeniaca and its parental species (D. mixta, D. valentini) based on ecological modelling // Salamandra. V. 55. № 3. P. 173–190.
  174. Petrosyan V.G., Osipov F.A., Bobrov V.V., Dergunova N.N., Kropachev I.I., Danielyan F.D., 2020. New records and geographic distribution of the sympatric zones of unisexual and bisexual rock lizards of the genus Darevskia in Armenia and adjacent territories // Biodiversity Data Journal. V. 8. P. e56030.
  175. Petrosyan V., Osipov F., Bobrov V., Dergunova N., Omelchenko A., Varshavskiy A., et al., 2020a. Species distribution models and niche partitioning among unisexual Darevskia dahli and its parental bisexual (D. portschinskii, D. mixta) rock lizards in the Caucasus // Mathematics. V. 8. № 8. P. 1329.
  176. Pinho C., Kaliontzopoulou A., Carretero M.A., Harris D.J., Ferrand N., 2009. Genetic admixture between the Iberian endemic lizards Podarcis bocagei and Podarcis carbonelli: evidence for limited natural hybridization and a bimodal hybrid zone // Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutional Research. V. 47. P. 368–377.
  177. Radtkey R.R., Donnellan S.C., Fisher R.N., Moritz C., Hanley K.A., Case T.J., 1995. When species collide: the origin and spread of an asexual species of gecko // Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. V. 259. P. 145–152.
  178. Röll B., von Düring M.U.G., 2008. Sexual characteristics and spermatogenesis in males of the parthenogenetic gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) // Zoology. V. 111. № 5. P. 385–400.
  179. Ross L., Normark B.B., 2015. Evolutionary problems in centrosome and centriole biology // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. V. 28. № 5. P. 995–1004.
  180. Rotelli M.D., Policastro R.A., Bolling A.M., Killion A.W., Weinberg A.J., et al., 2019. A Cyclin A–Myb-MuvB–Aurora B network regulates the choice between mitotic cycles and polyploid endoreplication cycles // PLoS Genetics. V. 15. P. e1008253.
  181. Saint Girons H., Ineich I., 1992. Histology of the reproductive tract of hybrids between gonochoristic males and parthenogenetic females of Lepidodactylus lugubris in French Polynesia (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) // Journal of Morphology. V. 212. № 1. P. 55–64.
  182. Schuett G.W., Fernandez P.J., Gergits W.F., Casna N.J., Chiszar D., et al., 1997. Production of offspring in the absence of males: evidence for facultative parthenogenesis in bisexual snakes // Herpetological Natural History. V. 5. № 1. P. 1–10.
  183. Shimizu Y., Shibata N., Sakaizumi M., Yamashita M., 2000. Production of diploid eggs through premeiotic endomitosis in the hybrid medaka between Oryzias latipes and O. curvinotus // Zoological Sciences. V. 17. P. 951–958.
  184. Sidharthan C., Roy P., Narayanan S., Karanth K.P., 2023 A widespread commensal loses its identity: Suggested taxonomic revision for Indotyphlops braminus (Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae) based on molecular data // Organisms Diversity & Evolution. V. 23. P. 169–183.
  185. Sinclair E.A., Pramuk J.B., Bezy R.L., Crandall K.A., Sites J.W., 2010. DNA evidence for nonhybrid origins of parthenogenesis in natural populations of vertebrates // Evolution. V. 64. P. 1346–1357.
  186. Spangenberg V., Arakelyan M., Galoyan E., Matveevsky S., Petrosyan R., Bogdanov Y., et al., 2017. Reticulate evolution of the rock lizards: Meiotic chromosome dynamics and spermatogenesis in diploid and triploid males of the genus Darevskia // Genes. V. 24. № 8. P. 149.
  187. Spangenberg V., Arakelyan M., Cioffi M.d.B., Liehr T., et al., 2020. Cytogenetic mechanisms of unisexuality in rock lizards // Scientific Reports. V. 10. P. 8697.
  188. Spangenberg V., Kolomiets O., Stepanyan I., Galoyan E., de Bello Cioffi M., Martynova E., et al., 2020а. Evolution of the parthenogenetic rock lizard hybrid karyotype: Robertsonian translocation between two maternal chromosomes in Darevskia rostombekowi // Chromosoma. V. 129. № 3–4. P. 275–283.
  189. Spangenberg V., Arakelyan M., Galoyan E., Martirosyan I., Bogomazova A., Martynova E., et al., 2021. Meiotic synapsis of homeologous chromosomes and mismatch repair protein detection in the parthenogenetic rock lizard Darevskia unisexualis // Molecular Reproduction and Development. V. 88. № 2. P. 119–127.
  190. Spangenberg V., Arakelyan M., Simanovsky S., Khachatryan E., Kolomiets O., 2024. Tendency towards clonality: Deviations of meiosis in parthenogenetic Caucasian rock lizards. Research Square.
  191. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3936576/v2 (препринт)
  192. Stamps J.A., 1977. Social behavior and spaсing patterns in lizards. In: Biology of the Reptilia. V. 7. Academic Press. Р. 265–334.
  193. Strasburg J.L., Kearney M., Moritz C., Templeton A.R., 2007. Combining phylogeography with distribution modeling: Multiple Pleistocene range expansions in a parthenogenetic gecko from the Australian arid zone // PLoS ONE. V. 2. № 8. e760.
  194. Stöck M., Dedukh D., Reifová R., Lamatsch D.K., Starostová Z., Janko K., 2021. Sex chromosomes in meiotic, hemiclonal, clonal and polyploid hybrid vertebrates: along the ‘extended speciation continuum’ // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.V. 376. № 1832. P. 20200103.
  195. Tarkhnishvili D., Gavashelishvili A., Avaliani A., Murtskhvaladze M., Mumladze L., 2010. Unisexual rock lizard might be outcompeting its bisexual progenitors in the Caucasus // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 101. № 2. P. 447–460.
  196. Tarkhnishvili D., Murtskhvaladze D., Anderson C.L., 2017. Coincidence of genotypes at two loci in two parthenogenetic rock lizards: how backcrosses might trigger adaptive speciation // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 121. P. 365–378.
  197. Tarkhnishvili D., Yanchukov A., Şahin M.K., Gabelaia M., Murtskhvaladze M., Candan K. et al., 2020. Genotypic similarities among the parthenogenetic Darevskia rock lizards with different hybrid origins // BMC Evolutionary Biology. V. 20. P. 1–12.
  198. Taylor H.L., Cole C.J., Hardy L.M, Dessauer H.C., Townsend C.R., Walker J.M., Cordes J.E., 2001. Natural hybridization between the teiid lizards Cnemidophorus tesselatus (parthenogenetic) and C. tigris marmoratus (bisexual): Assessment of evolutionary alternatives // American Museum Novitates. V. 3345. P. 1–64.
  199. Taylor H.L., Walker J.M., Cole C.J., Dessauer H.C., 2015. Morphological divergence and genetic variation in the triploid parthenogenetic teiid lizard, Aspidoscelis neotesselata // Journal of Herpetology. V. 49. № 3. P. 491–501.
  200. Trifonov V.A., Paoletti A., Caputo B.V., Kalinina T., O’Brien P.C., Ferguson-Smith M.A., Giovannotti M., 2015. Comparative chromosome painting and NOR distribution suggest a complex hybrid origin of triploid Lepidodactylus lugubris (Gekkonidae) // PLoS One. V. 10. № 7. P. e0132380.
  201. Trivers R.L., 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine. P. 136– 179.
  202. Uetz P., Freed P., Aguilar R., Hošek J., 2024. The Reptile Database [электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.reptile-database.org. Дата обновления: 05.09.2024.
  203. Van Valen L., 1973. A new evolutionary law // Evolutionary Theory. V. 1. P. 1–30.
  204. Vasil’ev V.P., Akimova N.V., Emel’yanova N.G., Pavlov D.A., Vasil’eva E.D., 2003. Reproductive capacities in the polyploid males of spined loaches from the unisexual–bisexual complex, occurred in the Moscow River // Folia Biologica (Krakow). V. 51. P. 67–73.
  205. Vergun A.A., Martirosyan I.A., Semyenova S.K., Omelchenko A.V., Petrosyan V.G., et al., 2014. Clonal diversity and clone formation in the parthenogenetic Caucasian rock lizard Darevskia dahli // PLoS ONE. V. 9. № 3.
  206. Vergun A.A., Girnyk A.E., Korchagin V.I., Semyenova S.K., Arakelyan M.S., et al., 2020. Origin, clonal diversity, and evolution of the parthenogenetic lizard Darevskia unisexualis // BMC Genomics. V. 21. № 351.
  207. Volobouev V., Pasteur G., Ineich I., Dutrillaux B., 1993. Chromosomal evidence for a hybrid origin of diploid parthenogenetic females from the unisexual-bisexual Lepidodactylus lugubris complex (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) // Cytogenetic and Genome Research. V. 63. № 3. P. 194–199.
  208. Vrijenhoek R.С., 1989. Genetic and ecological constraints on the origins and establishment of unisexual vertebrates. In: Dawley R.M., Bogart J.P., eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York: The New York State Museum. V. 466. P. 24–31.
  209. Walker J.M., Abuhteba R.M., Cordes J.E., 1991. Morphological and experimental verification of hybridization between all-female Cnemidophorus laredoensis and gonochoristic Cnemidophorus gularis (Squamata: Teiidae) // Herpetologica. V. 47. P. 152–164.
  210. Wiley R.H., 1998. Sexual selection and mate choice. Tradeoffs for males and females // Vertebrate mating systems Proceedings of the 14th Course of the International School of Ethology World scientific, Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong. Р. 9–45.
  211. Wogan G.O.U., Yuan M.L., Mahler D.L., Wang I.J., 2023 Hybridization and transgressive evolution generate diversity in an adaptive radiation of Anolis lizards // Systematic Biology. V. 72. № 4. P. 874–884.
  212. Woolley S.C., Sakata J.T., Crews D., 2004. Tracing the evolution of brain and behavior using two related species of whiptail lizards: Cnemidophorus uniparens and Cnemidophorus inornatus // Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal. V. 45. № 1. P. 46–53.
  213. Wright J.W., Lowe С.H., 1968. Weeds, polyploids, parthenogenesis, and the geographical and ecological distribution of all-female species of Cnemidophorus // Copeia. V. 1. P. 128–138.
  214. Wright J.W., Lowe С.H., 1976. Evolution of the alloploid parthenospecies Cnemidophorus tesselatus (Say) // Mammalian Chromosome Newsletter. V. 8. P. 95–96.
  215. Wright J.W., 1993. Evolution of whiptail lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus). In J.W. Wright & L.J. Vitt (eds). Biology of Whiptail Lizard. Journal Month: Journal Year. P. 27–82.
  216. Wynne-Edwards V., 1962. Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd. 660 p.
  217. Yamaguchi M., Lucas J.S., 1984. Natural parthenogenesis, larval and juvenile development, and geographical distribution of the coral reef asteroid Ophidiaster granifer // Marine Biology. V. 83. P. 33–42.
  218. Yanchukov A., Tarkhnishvili D., Erdolu M., Şahin M.K., Candan K., Murtskhvaladze M., et al., 2022. Precise paternal ancestry of hybrid unisexual ZW lizards (genus Darevskia: Lacertidae: Squamata) revealed by Z-linked genomic markers // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. V. 136. № 2. P. 293–305.
  219. Zug G., 2010. Speciation and dispersal in a low diversity taxon: The slender geckos Hemiphyllodactylus (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) // Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. V. 631. P. 1–70.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024