EU as a Trade Power: Adjusting Instruments of Foreign Economic Policy
- Authors: Sergeev E.A1, Soroka K.V2
-
Affiliations:
- MGIMO University
- Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
- Issue: No 4 (125) (2024)
- Pages: 73-86
- Section: PROBLEMS OF ECONOMY
- URL: https://kld-journal.fedlab.ru/0201-7083/article/view/652336
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708324040065
- ID: 652336
Cite item
Abstract
The focus of this study is aimed at the foreign economic policy of the European Union and the areas of its implementation. The article is based on a comprehensive approach to the concept of EU foreign economic policy as a set of instruments combining trade and investment policies of the EU. The study evaluates the communitarization of the main directions of the EU’s foreign economic policy. As a result, it is concluded that the exclusive competence of the supranational bodies of the Union is partially extended to investment policy. Considering that the paradigm of realism is taken as the basis for the study, the subject of the article is to assess the role of the EU’s foreign economic policy in the realization of the Union’s foreign policy interests. The authors believe that the European Union as a “trade power”, seeks not only to achieve economic benefits, but also to ensure that its trading partners meet a number of regulatory and value requirements. Taking into account the transformation of the world order, the need for the European Union to strengthen its own political subjectivity and economic competitiveness is increasing. This leads to the expansion of “defensive” measures in trade policy (sanctions mechanism for non-compliance with the provisions on sustainable development in trade agreements) and investment policy (mechanism for controlling foreign direct investments). As a result, it strengthens the normative and value content of EU foreign economic policy on one hand and make it more protectionist on the other hand. The authors of the article conclude that by means of foreign economic policy, the European Union, as a “trading force”, seeks to create and maintain an international trade order based on rules that are beneficial to the EU.
About the authors
E. A Sergeev
MGIMO University
Email: sergeev.e.a@my.mgimo.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor Department of World Economy Moscow, Russia
K. V Soroka
Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Email: soroka.krist@yandex.ru
Chief specialist-expert, Division of trade remedies, Department of Trade negotiations, Moscow, Russia
References
- Isatchenko Т.M., Rybasova А.V. (2003) Vneshnetorgovaya politica Yevropeiskogo soyuza: osnovniye instrumenti i napravleniya razvitiya [The Foreign Trade Policy of the European Union: Main Tools and Areas of Development], MGIMO, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
- Portanskij A.P. (2023) ES – SSHA: novye bar'ery v torgovle. [EU – USA: New Trade Barriers], Sovremennaya Evropa, 4, pp. 119‒131. doi: 10.31857/S020170832304006X (In Russian).
- Sergeev E.A., Vorotnikov V.V. (2023) Strategiya Evropejskogo soyuza v usloviyah global'noj perestrojki: avtonomiya ili evtanaziya? [The Strategy of the European Union in the Context of Global Restructuring: Autonomy or Euthanasia?], MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
- Babić M., Dixon A.D., Liu I.T. (ed.) (2022) The Political Economy of Geoeconomics: Europe in a Changing World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland. 206 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-01968-5
- Bismuth R. (2023) The New Frontiers of European Sanctions and the Grey Areas of International Law. RED. Vol. 5. Issue 1. P. 8‒13.
- Borchert I., Conconi P., Di Ubaldo M., Herghelegiu C. (2020) EU trade policies: Carrot-andstick mechanisms in pursuit of non-trade policy objectives. ECDPM Great Insights magazine. Vol. 9. Issue 2. URL: https://ecdpm.org/great-insights/square-pegs-round-holes-trade-policy/eu-tradepolicies-non-trade-objectives/ (accessed: 21.07.2023).
- Conconi P., Herghelegiu C., Puccio L. (2021) EU Trade Agreements: To Mix or not to Mix: That is the Question. Journal of World Trade. Vol. 55. No. 2. P. 231–260. doi: 10.54648/TRAD2021009
- de Luna Barrios A.M. (2016) The Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Mexico – Impact on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Revista Chilena de Derecho. Vol. 43. No. 1. P. 115‒135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372016000100006
- Kleimann D. (2020) The Legitimacy of “EU-only” Preferential Trade Agreements. The Law and Practice of the Common Commercial Policy. Ed. by M. Hahn, G. Van der Loo. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. P. 461‒485. doi: 10.1163/9789004393417_021
- Kuang S., Orbie J., Blancquaert S. (2023) The rise and fall of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: “open strategic autonomy” in action. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2023.2293779
- Mearsheimer J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton, N.Y., USA. 555 p.
- Meissner K.L. (2018) Commercial Realism and EU Trade Policy: Competing for Economic Power in Asia and the Americas. Routledge, Abingdon, UK; N.Y., USA. 215 p.
- Meunier S., Nicolaïdis K. (2011) The European Union as a Trade Power. International Relations and the European Union. Ed. by C. Hill, M. Smith. Oxford University Press, N.Y., USA. P. 275‒298.
Supplementary files
