Intrachain Distances in a Crumpled Polymer with Random Loops

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Crumpled polymer further folded into random loops has been proposed as a minimal model of chromosome organization. How do loops affect spatial distances in such a polymer? Here we investigate the statistics of intrachain distances, R(s)">R(s), at different length scales s in the ensemble of polymer configurations with frozen (quenched) disorder of loops. We delineate the effect of the loops by solving the model analytically for the crumpled polymer chain, which was long suggested as a null model of chromatin organization. As we show, the chain compacts across scales upon folding into loops and features a characteristic “toe” in R(s)">R(s) at the length scale of several loop sizes λ. Quantitatively comparing R(s)">R(s) with the behavior of the contact probability function, Pc(s)">Pc(s), computed in our previous works K. Polovnikov and B. Slavov, Phys. Rev. E 107, 054135 (2023) [1] and K. E. Polovnikov, B. Slavov, S. Belan, M. Imakaev, H. B. Brandáo, and L. A. Mirny, bioRxiv: 2022.02.01.478588 [2], we further demonstrate breaking of the famous mean-field relation between the two observables. The latter result is a striking manifestation of the non-Gaussianity of the polymer ensemble, induced by the loops disorder. Altogether, our theoretical findings pave the way towards quantitative inference of parameters of loopy chromosomes from the microscopy data in vivo and warn researchers against using Gaussian methods of analysis of population-averaged conformation capture datasets (e.g., Hi-C).

作者简介

B. Slavov

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

Email: skfoundation@sk.ru
121205, Moscow, Russia

K. Polovnikov

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: kipolovnikov@gmail.com
121205, Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. K. Polovnikov and B. Slavov, Phys. Rev. E 107, 054135 (2023).
  2. K. Polovnikov, B. Slavov, S. Belan, M. Imakaev, H.B. Brand?ao, and L.A. Mirny, bioRxiv (2023).
  3. L. Mirny and I. Solovei, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 439 (2021).
  4. E. J. Banigan and L. Mirny, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 64, 124 (2020).
  5. G. Fudenberg, N. Abdennur, M. Imakaev, A. Goloborodko, and L. Mirny, Harbor symposia on quantitative biology 82, 45 (2017).
  6. T. Terakawa, S. Bisht, J.M. Eeftens, C. Dekker, C.H. Haering, and E.C. Greene, Science 358, 672 (2017).
  7. M. Ganji, I.A. Shaltiel, S. Bisht, E. Kim, A. Kalichava, C.H. Haering, and C. Dekker, Science 360, 102 (2018).
  8. E. Orlandini, D. Marenduzzo, and D. Michieletto, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 8149 (2019).
  9. A. Goloborodko, J. F. Marko, and L.A. Mirny, Biophys. J. 110, 2162 (2016).
  10. E. Hildebrand, K. Polovnikov, B. Dekker, Y. Liu, D. Lafontaine, A. Fox, Y. Li, S. Venev, L. Mirny, and J. Dekker, bioRxiv (2022).
  11. J. Dixon, S. Selvaraj, F. Yue, A. Kim, Y. Li, Y. Shen, M. Hu, J. Liu, and B. Ren, Nature 485, 376 (2012).
  12. C. Arnould, V. Rocher, A.-L. Finoux, T. Clouaire, K. Li, F. Zhou, P. Caron, P. Mangeot, E. Ricci, R. Mourad, J. Haber, D. Noordermeer, and G. Legube, Nature 590, 660 (2021).
  13. A. Piazza, H. Bordelet, A. Dumont, A. Thierry, J. Savocco, F. Girard, and R. Koszul, Nat. Cell. Biol. 23, 1176 (2021).
  14. S. Brahmachari and J. Marko, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 24956 (2019).
  15. A. Grosberg, S. Nechaev, and E. Shakhnovich, Journal de physique 49, 2095 (1988).
  16. L. Mirny, Chromosome Res. 19, 37 (2011).
  17. A. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, S. Havlin, and A. Neer, Europhysics Letters 23, 373 (1993).
  18. T. Hsieh, C. Cattoglio, E. Slobodyanyuk, A. S. Hansen, X. Darzacq, and R. Tjian, BioRxiv (2021).
  19. S. Rao, S.-C. Huang, B.-G. St Hilaire et al. (Collaboration), Cell 171, 305 (2017).
  20. C. M¨unkel, R. Eils, S. Dietzel, D. Zink, C. Mehring, G. Wedemann, T. Cremer, and J. Langowski, J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1053 (1999).
  21. R.K. Sachs, G. Van Den Engh, B. Trask, H. Yokota, and J.E. Hearst, Academy of Sciences 92, 2710 (1995).
  22. M. Bohn and D. Heermann, Phys. Rev. E 76, 051805 (2007).
  23. O. Shukron and D. Holcman, Phys. Rev. E 96, 021503 (2017).
  24. J. Mateos-Langerak, W. Bohn, M. de Leeuw, O. Giromus, E. Manders, P. Verschure, M. Indemans, H. Gierman, D. Heermann, R. van Driel, and S. Goetze, PNAS 106, 3812 (2009).
  25. S. A. Belan and D.E. Starkov, JETP Lett. 115, 763 (2022).
  26. S. Belan and V. Parfenyev, arXiv:2301.03856 (2023).
  27. A.Y. Grosberg and A.R. Khokhlov, Statistical Mechanics of Macromolecules, AIP, Woodbury, NY. (1994), p. 350.
  28. K. Polovnikov, S. Nechaev, and M.V. Tamm, Soft Matter 14, 6561 (2018).
  29. K. Polovnikov, M. Gherardi, M. Cosentino-Lagomarsino, and M. Tamm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 088101 (2018).
  30. K. Polovnikov, S. Nechaev, and M.V. Tamm, Phys. Rev. E 99, 032501 (2019).
  31. B. Bintu, L. Mateo, J.-H. Su, N. Sinnott-Armstrong, M. Parker, S. Kinrot, K. Yamaya, A. Boettiger, and X. Zhuang, Science 362, eaau1783 (2018).
  32. B. Mandelbrot and J. Van Ness, SIAM review 10, 422 (1968).
  33. A. Grosberg, Soft Matter 10, 560 (2014).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Российская академия наук, 2023