Circadian Regulation of Expression of Carotenoid Metabolism Genes (PSY2, LCYE, CRTRB1, NCED1) in Leaves of Tomato Solanum lycopersicum L.

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The circadian dynamics of the expression of key genes of carotenoid metabolism (PSY2, LCYE, CrtRB1, and NCED1) in the photosynthetic tissue of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. (cultivar Korneevsky) plants was characterized. An in silico analysis of the gene expression pattern was carried out and a high level of their transcripts was detected in the leaf tissue. qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression was performed at six time points during the day and found the highest levels of PSY2, LCYE and NCED1 transcripts in the second half of the light phase, and CrtRB1 – at the end of the dark phase. The content and composition of carotenoids in leaf tissue in the middle of the day was determined and it was shown that the leaf accumulates 1.5 times more compounds of the ɛ/β-branch of carotenoid biosynthesis pathway than compounds of the β/β-branch.

About the authors

M. A. Filyushin

Institute of Bioengineering, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: michel7753@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. V. Shchennikova

Institute of Bioengineering, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: michel7753@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

E. Z. Kochieva

Institute of Bioengineering, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: michel7753@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Stra A., Almarwaey L.O., Alagoz Y., et al. // Front. Plant Sci. 2023. V. 13. 1072061.
  2. Stauder R., Welsch R., Camagna M., et al. // Front. Plant Sci. 2018. V. 9. 255.
  3. Li F., Vallabhaneni R., Yu J., Rocheford T., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2008. V. 147(3). P. 1334–1346.
  4. Ezquerro M., Burbano-Erazo E., Rodriguez-Concepcion M. // Plant Physiol. 2023. V. 193(3). P. 2021–2036.
  5. LaPorte M.F., Vachev M., Fenn M., et al. // G3 (Bethesda). 2022. V. 12(3). jkac006.
  6. Hu L., Feng S., Liang G., et al. // AMB Express. 2021. V. 11(1). 83.
  7. López-Ráez J.A., Kohlen W., Charnikhova T., et al. // New Phytol. 2010. V. 187. P. 343–354.
  8. Zhang M., Yuan B., Leng P. // J. Exp. Bot. 2009. V.60. P. 1579–1588.
  9. Kai W., Fu Y., Wang J., Liang B., et al. // Sci Rep. 2019. V. 9. 16943.
  10. Yang R., Yang T., Zhang H., et al. // Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014. V. 77. P. 23–34.
  11. Yari Kamrani Y., Shomali A., Aliniaeifard S., et al. // Cells. 2022. V. 11(7). 1154.
  12. Li F., Vallabhaneni R., Yu J., Rocheford T., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2008. V. 147. P. 1334–1346.
  13. Sun T.H., Liu C.Q., Hui Y.Y., et al. // J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010. V. 52. P. 868–878.
  14. Baek D., Kim W.Y., Cha J.Y., et al. // Plant Physiol. 2020. V. 184(1). P. 443–458.
  15. Efremov G.I., Ashikhmin A.A., Shchennikova A.V., et al. // Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2023. V. 70(2). P. 17

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences