Conceptual approaches to the formation of portable housing architecture

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Portable housing, developing in line with the current processes of prefabricated architecture formation, is undergoing qualitative changes at the present stage. The purpose of this study is to establish conceptual approaches to the implementation of portable residential facilities.The study identifies the main socio-cultural trends affecting the formation of ways to organize portable housing:reducing living space to a minimum within one cell, searching for ways to ensure a nomadic lifestyle and the development of radical home mobility, a technological trend towards introducing elements of virtual reality in the context of organizing residential environment with the possibility of its transfer to the meta-space. Analysis of modern implemented and design concepts for organizing ultra-compact dwellings made it possible to establish the following current approaches to the formation of a portable dwelling: a capsule prefabricated object based on a solid-body structure; a portable object that has the quality of expanded functionality of its structure-forming elements; elements of clothing and equipment capable of high-quality transformation into a portable shelter; user-powered portable housing; prefabricated shelter on a movable base for operation in various extreme environmental conditions; suspended portable objects not tied to a stationary site; meta-portable residential objects implemented on the basis of virtual reality technologies. It is show that a portable home instantly absorbs changes in the social and technological sphere, becoming an experimental object for the implementation of innovative solutions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. A. Kizilova

The Moscow Architectural Institute (State Academy)

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.kizilova@markhi.ru

Candidate of Sciences (Architecture), Docent

Russian Federation, 11/4, Rozhdestvenka Street, Moscow, 107031

References

  1. Denisova Yu.V. Problems of housing construction in the late XIX – early XX centuries. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 8, pp. 27–36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-8-27-36
  2. Saprykina N.A. Formation of eco-sustainable future habitat: Theory Practice Prospects [Formirovanie eko-ustoichivogo prostranstva budushchego: Teoriya. Praktika. Perspektivy]. Moscow: Kurs, 2021. 288 p.
  3. Saprykina N.A. Architectural concepts of the “Anthropocene” era as a challenge to civilization in the face of environmental risks. Sovremennaya arkhitektura mira. 2023. No. 1 (20), pp. 97–131. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25995/NIITIAG.2023.20.1.005
  4. Rappaport A. The road to home. Proekt Baikal. 2022. Vol. 19, No. 73, pp. 122–127. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.51461/pb.73.22
  5. Panfilov A.V. Pocket house and supra-spatial cities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering : International Conference on Civil, Architectural and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, CAEST 2019. Samara. 2020. Vol. 775, pp. 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/775/1/012052
  6. Eftaxiopoulos G., García M.Á. Infinite but Tiny: towards a hybrid architecture of dwelling. Delft Architecture Theory Journal. 2023. No. 17 (32), pp. 91–112.
  7. Rod’kin P.E. “Good design” in the metaverse: toward a problem statement. Tekhnicheskaya estetika i dizain-issledovaniya. 2023. Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 5–13. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34031/2687-0878-2023-5-2-5-13
  8. Volichenko O., Tsurik T. Artificial intelligence in conceptual prototyping design. Proekt Baikal. 2024. Vol. 21, No. 79, pp. 38–44. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/77.2281
  9. Kizilova S.A. Eco-sustainable trends in the development of reserve housing in conditions of social conflict. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2023. No. 1–2, pp. 13–18. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-1-2-13-18.
  10. Esaulov G.V. Urban environment: trends of transformation in times of pandemic. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2021. No. 1, pp. 5–12. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22337/2077-9038-2021-1-5-12
  11. Ogorodnikov S.N., Bulatov A.P. Principles of effective construction and operation of residential facilities in extreme northern conditions. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii. 2024. No. 1 (249), pp. 86–89. (In Russian).
  12. Patent RF 2605213. Sposob vozvedeniya nabivnoi konstruktsii v grunte [A method of constructing a printed structure in the ground]. Sokolov N.S., Dzhantimirov H.A., Kuzmin M.V., et al. Declared 01.07.2015. Published 20.12.2016. (In Russian).
  13. Sychev S.A., Badin G.M., Abass A.A., Al-Habeeb A.A. Passive methods of mounting elements of volume-block housing construction in conditions of limited energy resources. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2022. No. 10, pp. 27–33. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-10-27-32
  14. Saprykina N.A. The evolution of the formation of the architecture of the future in the context of the information paradigm. Fundamental, exploratory and applied research of the RAASN on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2021: a collection of scientific works of the RAASN. Moscow. 2022. Vol. 1, pp. 132–140. (In Russian).
  15. Arielli E., Rizzi V. Performativity and the domestic practices of embodied dwelling through enactivism, participation, and auto-construction. Itinera. 2023. No. 25, pp. 251–269. https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/20814
  16. Bagnato V.P. Design and public space the university campus’ open spaces between rituality and non-normativity. FORUM A+P: Interdisciplinary Journal of Architecture and Built Environment. 2021. No. 22, pp. 62–69. https://doi.org/10.37199/f40002207
  17. Gelfond A.L. Typological aspects of architectural environment dematerialization. Sovremennaya arkhitektura mira. 2023. No. 1 (20), pp. 33–56. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25995/NIITIAG.2023.20.1.002
  18. Saprykina N.A., Saprykin I.A. Formation of a communicative space as an alternative to the interaction of the private and public spheres. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: International Science and Technology Conference “Earth Science”, ISTC EarthScience 2022. Virtual, Online. 2022. pp. 052009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/988/5/052009
  19. Schumacher P. The metaverse as opportunity for architecture and society: design drivers, core competencies. Architectural Intelligence. 2022. No. 1, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-022-00010-z
  20. Kizilova S.A. Reserve housing in conditions of social conflict: prototypes and structural evolution. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2023. No. 2, pp. 108–117. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22337/2077-9038-2023-2-108-117

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Felt capsule module, architect F. Sewell. Source: https://design-milk.com/scs-sensory-concentration-space-freyja-sewell/?media_id=187821

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. Urban homeless shelter. Source: https://ulmernest.de/

Download (1MB)
4. Fig. 3. Deployable sleeping module, architect Chen Yu Jung. Source: https://www.yankodesign.com/2013/01/22/reliable-kit/

Download (399KB)
5. Fig. 4. Transformable tent dwelling, architects D. Schatz, T. Gor. Source: https://www.designboom.com/design/david-shatz-melina-urban-nomad-backpack-tent-03-21-2016/

Download (443KB)
6. Fig. 5. Shelter, transformable from outerwear, architect E. Tanimura. Source: https://www.yankodesign.com/2021/03/27/this-super-functional-outdoor-cloak-transforms-into-a-shelter-to-adapt-to-climate-change/

Download (1MB)
7. Fig. 6. А homeless shelter on a wheeled frame. Source: https://weburbanist.com/2012/03/19/housing-for-the-homeless-14-smart-sensitive-solutions/

Download (545KB)
8. Fig. 7. Homeless, designer Jeong-Yun Heo. Source: https://www.designboom.com/project/pumpjump/

Download (239KB)
9. Fig. 8. Mobile disaster shelter, architects Encore heureux + G studio. Source: https://www.designboom.com/architecture/encore-heureux-g-studio-room-room-crossing-dialogues-for-emergency-architecture/

Download (474KB)
10. Fig. 9. Membrane shelter, architect Berni Du Payrat. Source: https://www.cocoontree.com/cocoon-tree-village

Download (1MB)
11. Fig. 10. Biomorphic dwelling in the metaverse, studio Six N. Five. Source: https://sixnfive.com/projects/make-a-room-for-us/

Download (403KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Advertising publishing company "STROYMATERIALY"